Blog · Tag
loopio.
6 posts in this archive.
Competitive moves in Q1 2026, a running log
What Loopio, Responsive, and AutogenAI announced in Q1 2026. What we shipped against them. Opinion piece — I'm the founder, this is my read on the market.
Reviews watch: what G2 and Capterra said in January
Monthly sweep of public review activity on Loopio, Responsive, QorusDocs, and Upland Qvidian. Q4 fallout shows up in January — renewal cycles, budget cuts, product regressions flagged in the wild.
Loopio at ten: what a decade of reviews tells us
Reading 10 years of public Loopio reviews end-to-end. The trajectory of buyer sentiment from 2016 to 2025, what the product fixed, what it never did, and what the trajectory predicts for incumbent RFP tools generally.
The overpriced document repository trap
An opinion piece on why most RFP tools end up unused. The reviews tell a consistent story across Loopio, Responsive, and Qvidian: teams pay for AI features and end up using a search box. We have a theory about why.
Reviews watch: what G2 and Capterra said in September
Monthly aggregation of public review activity across the major proposal-management vendors. Four competitor deltas worth noting from September 2025.
The Loopio teardown: what 1,700 customers are actually paying for
Loopio is the category's reference customer. Reviews, pricing signals, and product surface area, taken seriously. What it does well, what it doesn't, and what 1,700 customers are buying when they renew.
See the proposal workflow
Take the 5-minute tour, then start a trial workspace when you're ready to run a real pursuit against your own source material.